I, one of the People, (as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), Republican in Form, Sui Juris, do present you with this notice that you and your agents may provide due care.

 
Please take notice that the People, exercising our sovereign authority, have diligently prepared and united to demand strict adherence to fundamental constitutional principles. Governor Maura Healey, you have willfully abandoned your sworn constitutional duties, elevating inferior "laws" above the Constitution and acting beyond your delegated authority. This constitutes a direct assault on the Constitution and the People, rendering you a domestic enemy to this nation. Under the self-executing provisions of the 14th Amendment, Sections 3 and 4, your office is vacated due to these violations, and all actions taken under your authority are null and void. You are disqualified from receiving public funds, and you are permanently barred from holding any public office in the United States.

Please take notice that the laws of nature are constant and hold the highest authority. All individuals are equal under God and the law, affirming natural equality and rights that no government can violate. This eternal law cannot be altered or overridden by human institutions. Therefore, for laws and government actions to be legitimate and just, they must conform to these unalienable rights and the laws of nature and nature's God. (The authorities cited below are Maxims of law, universally recognized and accepted by all, requiring no proof, argument, or discourse. Id. 67a.)

• Maxim 74j. Things which are forbidden by the nature of things are confirmed by no law. Branch, Prine. Positive laws are framed after the laws of nature and reason. Finch, Law. 74r
• Maxim 59n. According to the laws of nature, it is just that no one should be enriched through detriment and injury to another, i.e., at another's expense. Dig. 50, 17, 200.

Please take notice that we are endowed by our Creator with natural, essential, inherent, and unalienable ri ghts that are beyond the reach of government authority. These rights, outlined in declaratory and restrictive clauses to prevent any misuse of power, are inviolable and lie outside the government's control. The enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution must never be interpreted to deny or diminish the other rights retained by the people, and as these rights are endowed by God, neither man nor government can vote them away. (The following authorities are cited below:)

• Maxim 590. Law is a rule of right, and whatever is contrary to the rule of right is an injury. 3 Bulst. 313.
• Maxim 51i. Individual liberties are antecedent to all government. C.L.M.
• Maxim 51b. The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government. C.L.M.
• Maxim 51c. Obedience makes government, not the name by which it is called. C.L.M.
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) page 491 "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.
• Massachusetts Constitution, Part the First, Article I: "All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness."

Please take notice that the sole purpose of government is to protect the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. When public officials exceed the constitutional limits of their power, it is an act of usurpation and treason against the people's sovereignty. Any action beyond this is overreach, and when the government fails to secure these rights, the people have the undeniable right to alter it for their safety and well-being. (The following authorities are cited below:)

• Objective of government. That the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions, it is usurpation and oppression. Alabama Constitution, Article I, § 35
• To secure these rights government is instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. -Declaration of Independence
• Maxim of Law 51p. The main object of government is the protection and preservation of personal rights, private property, and public liberties, and upholding the law of God. American Maxim.
• Tucker Blackstone Vol. 1 Appendix Note B [Section 3] 1803 If in a limited government, the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, treason against the sovereignty of the people.
• Maxim of Law 51r. As usurpation is the exercise of power, which another has a right to; so, tyranny is the exercise of powMaxim 9b. makes clear that the term "arms" includes not just traditional weapons like shields and swords but also clubs, stones, and by extension, modern firearms of various kinds. This broad interpretation means that restricting specific types of firearms, such as ghost guns or untraceable firearms, exceeds the government's authority, as they fall within the definition of "arms" protected under the Constitution.er beyond right, which nobody can have a right to. Locke, Treat. 2, 18,199.

Please take notice that no branch of government holds the authority to infringe upon the right to bear arms, as this right exists outside the power of government. The Constitution clearly protects this fundamental right, and any attempt by the government to violate it is void. As affirmed by Marbury V. Madison, laws repugnant to the Constitution hold no legitimacy. Every branch of government is strictly confined by this truth, and no government entity can lawfully act beyond these constitutional limits. (The following authorities are cited below:)

• Maxim 9b. makes clear that the term "arms" includes not just traditional weapons like shields and swords but also clubs, stones, and by extension, modern firearms of various kinds. This broad interpretation means that restricting specific types of firearms, such as ghost guns or untraceable firearms, exceeds the government's authority, as they fall within the definition of "arms" protected under the Constitution.
• Maxim 9c. emphasizes that the right to bear arms is a fundamental liberty of free citizens, allowing them to retain weapons suited to their personal defense needs. Ghost guns and untraceable firearms are tools of self-defense, and any government attempt to ban them infringes on this core liberty. Maxim 9d. asserts that "laws are silent amidst arms," meaning that in situations of self-defense, the natural right to bear arms takes precedence over legal restrictions. The government's attempt to regulate or ban firearms like ghost guns contravenes this principle by undermining the individual's right to protection. The Second Amendment explicitly guarantees "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Any law that seeks to ban certain types of arms, including ghost guns, violates this clear constitutional protection.
• Maxim 9d. asserts that "laws are silent amidst arms," meaning that in situations of self-defense, the natural right to bear arms takes precedence over legal restrictions. The government's attempt to regulate or ban firearms like ghost guns contravenes this principle by undermining the individual's right to protection.
  
• The Second Amendment explicitly guarantees "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Any law that seeks to ban certain types of arms, including ghost guns, violates this clear constitutional protection.

Please take notice that you have taken an oath to support and uphold the national and state Constitutions and are constitutionally mandated to abide by that oath in the performance of your official duties and it is immaterial whether such an oath is given by words or by acts and deeds. The failure of attorneys to understand the lawful obligation inherent in the oath of office for public servants, and/or the presenting of information contrary to the universally admitted authority of fundamental law, to any government official or worker, does not excuse the government official or worker from failing to understand their duty, nor does it exempt them from properly performing it. (The following authorities are cited below:)

• The National Constitution, Article VI, Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
• Maxim 84b.: It is immaterial whether a man gives his assent by words or by acts and deeds. 10 Coke, 52.

Please take notice that we, the people, hold all political power, and public officials, including Maura Healey, are our substitutes and agents. We have an indefeasible right to instruct them and require strict adherence to the fundamental principles of law. As public servants, they are bound by our sovereign authority to obey the lawful commands of the people to uphold justice and preserve liberty. (The following authorities are cited below:)

• Maxim 510. All Political Power is inherent in the people by decree of God, thus none can exist except it be derived from them. American Maxim Maxim 11s: One lawfully commanding must be obeyed. Jenk. Cent. 120.
• Massachusetts Constitution, Part the First, Article V: "All power residing originally in the people, and being derived from them, the several magistrates and officers of government, vested with authority, whether legislative, executive, or judicial, are their substitutes and agents, and are at all times accountable to them."  
• Massachusetts Constitution, Part the First, Article XVIII: "A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a constant adherence to those of piety, justice, moderation, temperance, industry, and frugality, are absolutely necessary to preserve the advantages of liberty, and to maintain a free government. The people ought, consequently, to have a particular attention to all those principles, in the choice of their officers and representatives: and they have a right to require of their lawgivers and magistrates, an exact and constant observance of them, in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for the good administration of the commonwealth. Since governors play a central role in both proposing and executing laws, they are included in this mandate. The people have the right to require strict adherence to these principles from all public officials, including the governor, to ensure the proper administration of government and the preservation of liberty.

Please take notice that the above positions are true, factual, lawful, and constitutionally ordained. However, despite the above-stated factual, lawful positions, your un-Constitutional actions, as described throughout this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, clearly demonstrate how you have violated all of the above lawful positions, the Constitutions, your oath of office, acted against the public good by violating the public trust and committing sedition and rebellion. Pursuant to your unlawful and unconstitutional actions, you have invoked the self-executing Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th Amendment to the national Constitution, thereby have lawfully vacated your office and forfeited all benefits thereof, including salary and pension.

Please take notice of the following facts concerning Governor Maura Healey's actions related to the migrant influx into Massachusetts, her use of emergency powers to implement gun control laws, and the resulting violations of constitutional principles and public safety. The following statements establish a clear case of maladministration, constitutional violations, and the misuse of executive powers:

1. Maura Healey's actions undermine the constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government, as mandated by Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. The Founders, when establishing the United States as a Constitutional Republic in 1787, aimed to create a system where power originates from the people but is constrained by clear constitutional limits to protect minority rights. Figures like James Madison emphasized that a republican government derives its authority directly or indirectly from the people, with safeguards against the risks of majoritarian rule. The Founders were deeply skeptical of democracies, viewing them as inherently unstable. John Adams warned that democracy is short-lived and self-destructive, while Thomas Jefferson likened it to "mob rule" where the majority can easily infringe upon the rights of the minority. Benjamin Franklin echoed these concerns, describing democracy as a predatory system where majorities could impose their will unchecked.

By promoting democratic principles instead of upholding the established republican framework, Healey bypasses the constitutional authority vested in the people and undermines the legal structure set by the Founders. This shift suggests an attempt to unilaterally alter the government's structure, a move Jefferson considered tyrannical. Both the Massachusetts and U.S. Constitutions affirm that all political power rests with the people, and their authority must not be usurped. Healey's actions, which emphasizea democratic model over the foundational republican framework based on the rule of law and sovereignty of the people, betray this constitutional guarantee and erode the protections the Founders intended to preserve.

2. Maura Healey Failed to Guard Against Invasion (U.S. Constitution Article IV, Section 4): Under both the U.S. and Massachusetts Constitutions, the governor is obligated to repel, resist, and expel any invaders that threaten the state's safety. This duty is paramount, especially in cases of a migrant influx, which destabilizes public services. Governor Healey not only failed to protect the state but facilitated this crisis by coordinating with federal authorities to bring migrants into Massachusetts. Healey's acceptance of federal funding tied to migrant relocation compromises the state's sovereignty. By admitting the strain of this migrant crisis through her declaration of emergency, she admits her failure to safeguard the public welfare, a clear act of maladministration. The Massachusetts Constitution demands that the governor use all means available to protect the people from hostile forces, including economic destabilization from unchecked migration.

3. Maura Healey Violated of Article LXII of the Massachusetts Constitution through her Unlawful Use of Public Funds: By providing housing, money, and resources to non-citizens, Governor Healey violated Article LXII, Section 1 of the Massachusetts Constitution, which prohibits using public funds for private entities or individuals without proper authorization. The redistribution of taxpayer funds to assist non-residents is unconstitutional and a gross overreach of her executive powers.

4. Maura Healey Used Faux Emergency Powers and Usurpation of Authority: Governor Healey declared a state of emergency in response to the shelter crisis caused by the migrant influx. This declaration is a clear admission that her administration failed to maintain public order, which she is constitutionally mandated to uphold.

There is no original grant of authority in the original organic Massachusetts Constitution delegating the governor emergency powers, rendering such acts void ab initio. As articulated by legal scholars and reflected in maxims of law, "What is not expressly written is prohibited". Healey's reliance on faux emergency powers circumvents the constitutional process, infringing on the people's right to petition and address grievances.

5. Governor Maura Healey's Use Of An Emergency Preamble To Block A Voter Referendum On Gun Control Not Only Represents An Unconstitutional Overreach But Also A Violation Of Fundamental Rights: All governmental authority must originate from the people, and the legislature cannot delegate powers to the governor that were not explicitly granted by the people themselves. As Thomas Paine emphasized in The Rights of Man, government power is a trust delegated by the people, and any power assumed beyond this delegation constitutes usurpation. By invoking an emergency preamble to prevent a voter referendum, Governor Healey has not only acted ultra vires (beyond lawful authority) but has also infringed on the people's fundamental right to redress grievances. Article XIX of the Massachusetts Constitution guarantees the right to assemble and petition the government, which Healey's emergency action directly obstructed. Therefore, her actions violate both the constitutional framework and the principle that unauthorized assertions of power are inherently void.

6. Maura Healey Misused "Public Safety" As A Justification For Tyranny: The Founders viewed public safety as the government's duty to protect life, liberty, and property without infringing on individual rights. They explicitly warned against the misuse of public safety as a justification for tyranny. Public safety, as articulated in documents like the Federalist Papers and Common Sense by Thomas Paine, does not allow the government to act unilaterally or suppress the people's constitutionally protected rights.

7. Protecting The Right to Bear Arms is Mandatory and Her Actions Violated Article XVIII of the Massachusetts Constitution: Governor Healey's actions violate Article XVIII of the Massachusetts Constitution, which mandates the preservation of liberty through adherence to fundamental principles. This article stresses the importance of not suspending constitutional rights, even in times of crisis. By misusing emergency powers to bypass these principles, Healey disregarded this mandate. Additionally, there is no authority to infringe on the Second Amendment, which explicitly guarantees the right to bear arms, or on Article XVII of the Massachusetts Constitution, which affirms the people's right to keep and bear arms for the common defense. The Founders provided no emergency provisions allowing for such rights to be suspended, underscoring that liberty must be safeguarded at all times.

8. Maura Healey Misused Commerce As a Tool for Tyranny: The Founders were keenly aware of the dangers of using governmental powers as instruments of oppression. As Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense, the purpose of government is to safeguard the natural rights of life, liberty, and property, and any use of authority that contravenes these rights constitutes tyranny. Using the commerce clause to restrict or limit the purchase of firearms as a way to achieve what the government could not directly do-disarm or weaken the people-is a direct violation of this principle.

Notice of Liability

Please take notice that your actions, which constitute various acts of tyranny, are unacceptable and activate the self-executing provisions of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The people hold the right to restore a lawful government to protect their rights, liberties, and constitutional order. Your unconstitutional behavior, detailed in this Notice, clearly demonstrates violations of your lawful duties, the Constitutions, and your oath of office. These actions amount to maladministration by breaching public trust and committing acts of rebellion against the Constitution. Through your failure to respond to lawful notifications from the people, you have tacitly acknowledged these violations, committing several acts of tyranny against the Commonwealth and its citizens, including but not limited to:

• She has failed to protect the Commonwealth from invasion, allowing a foreign influx to destabilize our public systems, and endangering the safety and welfare of the citizens she is sworn to protect.
• She has limited our ability to protect ourselves and our property, undermining the natural right of self-defense, which is guaranteed to the people as their inherent and inalienable right.
• She has violated our right to bear arms, infringing upon a sacred right enshrined in both the U.S. and Massachusetts Constitutions, essential for the defense of life, liberty, and property.
• She has unlawfully invoked emergency powers, powers that were never delegated to her by the people, using them as a pretext to bypass constitutional processes and impose her will upon the people without their consent.
• She has subverted the people's constitutionally protected rights, particularly the right to petition for redress of grievances, employing an emergency preamble to block the people's lawful participation in their own governance.
• She has misallocated public funds, using the taxes of the people to provide benefits to non-citizens in violation of the Massachusetts Constitution, thereby betraying her duty to uphold the financial integrity of the Commonwealth.

• She has abrogated constitutional rights under the guise of commercial regulation, attempting to restrict the people's rights through indirect means by misusing the power to regulate commerce, thereby committing a deliberate end-run around their constitutional protections.
• She has usurped powers never granted by the people, taking upon herself authority that lies solely within the sovereign power of the people, violating the foundational principle that all political power originates from the people and must be exercised only with their consent.

Please take notice that your acts of tyranny, including but not limited to the aforementioned violations, are intolerable and trigger the self-executing provisions of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The people retain the right to restore lawful government, ensuring the preservation of their rights, liberties, and the constitutional order.

Your unconstitutional actions, as detailed throughout this Notice, clearly show that you have violated these lawful duties, the Nation and State Constitutions, and your oath of office, engaging in maladministration against the public good by breaching public trust and committing acts of rebellion against the Constitution.

Due to your unlawful and unconstitutional conduct, you have triggered the self-executing provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment, resulting in the lawful vacating of your office and forfeiture of all associated benefits, including salary and pension. Your office has been vacated and your failure to promptly step down and resign will be viewed as an additional willful trespass, carried out with full knowledge, intent, and malice.

Furthermore, if you maintain a differing viewpoint and question the legitimacy of any of these statements, or you believe that you are above the law and do not need to strictly observe and adhere to the provisions of the Constitution, you must reply within ten (10) business days through a sworn affidavit under the pains and penalties of perjury. This reply should contain constitutional provisions that justify your authority to infringe upon the People's rights or to disregard our lawful directives. If you fail to specifically rebut, in kind, any of the charges, claims, and positions set forth in this notice, then, you tacitly admit to them, and these admissions will be lawfully used against you.

I retain the right to resolve this matter through an arbitrator of my choosing, with the decision being binding and no court shall have the authority to rehear this matter; it shall stand as evidence, truth, and law in all courts of record.

This Notice is delivered with peace and the love of our Creator, urging you to give immediate and proper attention to the People, in whom all political power resides. It also serves to reinforce all previous affidavits and lawful notifications concerning the maladministration by Maura Healey.